Paul Lee and Marc Pingris End Game Controversial Play Video

Paul Lee made a three-point attempt for a chance to tie the game and hit Marc Pingris but no foul was called paving way for a big comeback by San Mig Coffee after being down by 17 points against Rain or Shine to win Game 1, 104-101.

Do you think a foul should have been called on Marc Pingris?

View 2014 PBA Governors Cup Finals Schedule and Results

Video uploaded by czar julius

30 Responses to Paul Lee and Marc Pingris End Game Controversial Play Video

  1. andrew says:

    Perry Martinez is INCONSISTENT with his statement. He first said “I think the defensive player is going vertical”. Then he take it back ” Pasugod pa din ang defensive player”.
    My point of view – It is a good non-call. Why? Pingris actually land on the floor before Lee initiate the contact.Lee was not confident or don’t want to be the one to blame if he missed the shot and so he has to made contact for a possible 3-free throw which didn’t happen. BIG TIME player take the shot whether it goes in or goes out of the rim. Lee should learn that thing. How many times we’ve seen James Yap, L.A Tenorio, Mark Caguioa, Jason Castro and other big names in the league taking big shots then eventually missed it and lost the game? That’s how basketball played. Hit or miss you take it and take it upon yourself.
    In the case of AZ REID, it is clearly a foul on PJ Simon. Why? AZ caught PJ mid air and made contact, and there was not enough time for PJ to avoid the contact and he land on AZ. so the referee blow the whistle for a foul on PJ simon.

    • leemawn says:

      good point. pingris foot already landed so theres no foul

    • GUIA says:

      tama… dpat s laro marunong tayo tumangap ng talo…

    • guia says:

      nagppkta lng yan n hindi cla marunong tumangap ng pagkatlo nla… dpat ksi no comment muna kng hindi p kyo panalo ksi hindi basta2 ang team n binabanga nyo…

    • ray says:

      TaGalugin m nalang pre next time… Pero para sakin tamang non-call un, s nba, tinatawagan n nga ng offensive foul mga ganung galaw. D ako masyadong pamilyar s traveling(dahil paiba iba sila ng sinusuno) pero kung ako ang ref, bka tinawagan ko p ng traveling un. Aftr magfake ni lee, ginalaw nya both feet nya meaning, he lost his pivot foot

    • francis ison says:

      Different players have different strategies on how they will make the shot. i think hindi na relevant ung paghuhusga mo sa player on how they take the shot. sa tingin mo anu pinairal ni paul lee kung gusto niya na mafoul siya. diba it’s a smart play kasi instead of doing the normal thing na ishoot nalang, he shoot the ball and tried to draw the foul, parang hitting two birds with one stone. Basketball is very far from what you think. Hindi pagandahan ng form o papogian ang laro, utakan din ito sa court.tama man o mali ung call yung pag compare mo sa ibang player kay paul lee eh walang ka kwenta kwenta. magkakaibang tao sila, iba’t ibang team at iba’t ibang laro.

  2. adones says:

    bakit naman ma foul c Pingris c Paul Lee nga ang sumogod sa kanya.. tama yung REFF..

  3. hhahah says:

    perry martinez prang ndi nya atah alam pinagsasabi nya eh mkikita mo sa mukha.hahaha

  4. apple says:

    bakit ba kasi sinisisi ang referee?tama namn ginawa nya.at sabi nang consoltant dapat may foul?c lee sumugod at bumangga,dapat lang nawala, bakit pag ang mixers nalagay sa mga sitwasyon na dapat may foul d namn tinatawagan nang ref?wala nang reaksyon..bakit ang kabilang team ginagawang issue?move on……..pinahihirapan nyo sarili nyo…nagpapakita talaga kaayo sa totoo nyong ugali.walang sportsmanship,at madumi mag laro.. violente…grav kaayo?matoto kayo magpakatotoo

    • jun abalos says:

      foul yun talaga kasi pasugod c pingris sa kanya, alangan naman pa atras sya titira para lang makaiwas sya? sa larong basketball kung sino yung may dala ng bola or may hawak sya ang may malaking karapatan sa bola gets nyo yun? syempre pasugod ang tira ni paul lee kasi malayo sya tumira and at the same time nag papasabit din sya para makakuha ng foul kasi ganun yung larong basketball eh, sya ang may hawak ng bola. kaya nga may violation na tinatawag na foul kasi nga maraming pwedeng gawin sayo kung ikaw may hawak ng bola para hindi kalang maka score. kahit nga masagi lang ng konti ang braso mo habang titira ka foul na kaagad yun kasi may contact eh. pag defender ka sa larong basketball ikaw talaga dapat ang umiwas sa may dala ng bola, pwede mo syang guardyahan sa paraan na kaya mo basta hwag mo lang sya sagiin, kahit nga sumigaw ka while action shooting sya foul parin yun kahit hindi mo sya na sagi eh yun pa kaya ngyari ky pingris.

      • Ewan says:

        Duh? Pag hawak mo bola karapatan mo na bumangga? Ang tawag dun offensive foul boy! Isip isip muna bago comment!

      • jay says:

        kung magiging legit ang move ni paul lee imagine basketball at its worst.. lahatng crucial shots makakakuha ng foul ang mga may hawak ng bola.. basta isugod lang nila ang katawan nla ok lng iinvade ang space ng defender at iwan ang space ng offensive

      • Barok Tasyo Boljak says:

        ikaw yung tipo ng player pagka walang referee or just a pick up game laro larong kanto eh – NANA. Dapat sa iyo magpagaling ng NANA sa utak, tanga!!!

  5. Normandy Canlas says:

    Parang conflicting yun analysis nitong Perry, sabi nya verticality ang movement ni Pingris, it was Paul Lee daw who advanced his body forward to hit or touch body with Pingris, so I agree with him in the beginning, tapos biglang nag conclude na foul daw si Pingris? hahahaha!

    • Barok Tasyo Boljak says:

      Hahaha nahalata mo rin pala katangahan nung analyst na si Perry. Dapat doon eh mag referee na lang sa badminton ang tanga….

  6. DUDE says:

    Tough to decide but , . i think it was a good call,. Pingris motion leap vertica towards paul lee. , marc was on vertical fall, he was just more like a half a meter away from lee when he was landing, but paul lee just bang his way to pingris. , .

  7. romy gonzalez says:

    Tama ang referee it’s a judgment call. Defensive player was going with both hands, up when the offensive player step back and made an attempt going forward while in the air and a body contact was made on the defensive player whose both hands still up. It shows the offensive player initiated the foul. Anyway it’s just the first of several games, nothing to complain about, just move on.

  8. zen says:

    Dapat pinituhan to ng ref,dapat tinawagan ng travelling violation si paul lee,masyadong nagfocus sa contact e before contact may violation na…haist

  9. nashkie ampaso says:

    hmf tama ang referee… mayabang kc ang rain or shine kaya sila natalo

  10. Alaska Fan says:

    In my opinion, it was a heads up play by Lee, smart play.. and it’s a foul on Pingris. Parang mga fake lang nila Wade at Kobe.. Pero para sa mga fans ng RoS at SMC, malamang walang katapusang debate yan.. ang sakin lang, there was a clear contact on a shot attempt and there should have been a call, either defensive or offensive foul.. magtalo na kayo kung anu ba dapat sa dalawa, pero at least sana may pito/tawag dahil malinaw na may contact. Parang sa blocking/charging call din, sure na may contact pili ka nalang sa dalawa..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *